Article
2229 of the Civil Code provides that exemplary damages may be imposed “by way
of example or correction for the public good, in addition to the
moral,
temperate, liquidated or compensatory damages.”
They are, however, not recoverable as a matter of right. They are
awarded only if the guilty party acted in a wanton, fraudulent, reckless,
oppressive or malevolent manner.
In
this case, we agree with the CA that although the revocation was done in bad
faith, respondents did not act in a wanton, fraudulent, reckless, oppressive or
malevolent manner. They revoked the SPA
because they were not satisfied with the amount of the loan approved. Thus, petitioners are not entitled to
exemplary damages (Albert
M. Ching, et al. Vs. Felix M. Bantolo, et al., G.R. No. 177086. December 5,
2012).
No comments:
Post a Comment