In the present case, HFC did not commit forum
shopping because the third element of litis pendentia is lacking. As previously mentioned, the DARAB’s land
valuation is only preliminary and is not, by any means, final and conclusive
upon the landowner or any other interested party. The courts, in this case, the SAC, will still
have to review with finality the determination, in the exercise of what is
admittedly a judicial function. Thus, it becomes clear that there is no
identity between the two cases such that a judgment by the DARAB, regardless of
which party is successful, would amount to res judicata in the case before the
SAC (Land Bank of the Philippines Vs. Honeycomb Farms Corporation, G.R. No. 166259. November 12, 2012).
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment