Based on the foregoing contextual background, and absent
further proof showing clear malicious intent, we are constrained to rule that
the specific animus iniuriandi was not present in this case. Even if
the specific acts of punching, kicking, paddling, and other modes of inflicting
physical pain were done voluntarily, freely, and with intelligence, thereby
satisfying the elements of freedom and intelligence in the felony of physical injuries,
the fundamental ingredient of criminal intent was not proven beyond reasonable
doubt. On the contrary, all that was proven was that the acts were done
pursuant to tradition. Although the additional “rounds” on the second night
were held upon the insistence of Villareal and Dizon, the initiations were
officially reopened with the consent of the head of the initiation rites; and
the accused fraternity members still participated in the rituals, including the
paddling, which were performed pursuant to tradition. Other than the paddle, no
other “weapon” was used to inflict injuries on Lenny. The targeted body parts
were predominantly the legs and the arms. The designation of roles, including
the role of auxiliaries, which were assigned for the specific purpose of
lending assistance to and taking care of the neophytes during the initiation
rites, further belied the presence of malicious intent. All those who wished to
join the fraternity went through the same process of “traditional” initiation;
there is no proof that Lenny Villa was specifically targeted or given a
different treatment.
Consequently, the collective acts of the fraternity members
were tantamount to recklessness, which made the resulting death of Lenny a
culpable felony. It must be remembered that organizations owe to their initiates a duty of care not to
cause them injury in the process. With the foregoing facts, we rule that the accused are guilty
of reckless imprudence resulting in homicide. Since the NBI medico-legal
officer found that the victim’s death was the cumulative effect of the injuries
suffered, criminal responsibility redounds to all those who directly
participated in and contributed to the infliction of physical injuries. (Artemio Villareal Vs. People
of the Philippines/People of the Philippines Vs. The
Honorable Court of Appeals, et al./Fidelito Dizon Vs. People
of the Philippines/Gerarda H. Villa Vs. Manuel
Lorenzo Escalona II, et al.,
G.R. No. 151258/G.R. No. 154954/G.R. No. 155101/G.R. Nos. 178057 & G.R. No. 178080. February 1, 2012)
G.R. No. 151258/G.R. No. 154954/G.R. No. 155101/G.R. Nos. 178057 & G.R. No. 178080. February 1, 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment